Posts:
4,347
Registered:
2/11/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Oct 28, 2009 10:52 PM
in response to: manowar
|
|
|
"'Timothy McVeigh, Timothy McVeigh'"
Mary Hartman! Mary Hartman!
|
|
Posts:
1,147
Registered:
2/11/09
|
|
|
Posts:
2,702
Registered:
3/2/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 1:09 AM
in response to: manowar
|
|
|
Hmm, US should have a visa of Indian Wild Bears to fight for them in Afghanistan, given the progress there.
|
|
Posts:
1,147
Registered:
2/11/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 7:16 AM
in response to: CodeCorrector
|
|
|
> Hmm, US should have a visa of Indian Wild Bears to
> fight for them in Afghanistan, given the progress
> there.
Leave it to an Indian to complain about the progress of AMERICANS in fighting
jihadis in THEIR OWN neighborhood.
That it is the job of Americans to
have to go all the way across the planet to do a dirty job that India
is too lazy, cheap, scared or incompetent to do herself.
Of course you Indians are grinning at the stupidity of Americans
doing your dirty work for you in fighting jihadis- just like you laugh at the stupidity
of Americans giving you jobs that you cannot create for yourselves in India.
I say, US out of Afghanistan.
Let the jihadis roll over India and do what they please.
|
|
Posts:
2,702
Registered:
3/2/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 1:28 PM
in response to: manowar
|
|
|
> I say, US out of Afghanistan.
> Let the jihadis roll over India and do what they
> please.
Pop quiz....
Where was Bin Laden & Co sitting and planning the 9/11?
Sure, roll out of Afghanistan, and let the jihadis do what they please!! 
|
|
Posts:
2,549
Registered:
5/2/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 2:13 PM
in response to: CodeCorrector
|
|
|
Er, Hamburg?
I am on the fence. I can't see we can win in Afghanistan without a lot more troops for a long time and I can't see Obama would ever commit himself to that. He doesn't want Afghanistan to be his Iraq (or Vietnam for that matter)
|
|
Posts:
2,702
Registered:
3/2/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 2:59 PM
in response to: NHJoan
|
|
|
> He doesn't want Afghanistan to be his Iraq (or
> Vietnam for that matter)
And now that he has been given the peace prize!! 
But I agree with your assessment. In fact, I'd say, even with a lot more troops, Afghanistan war is unwinnable.
Basically, depends on how you define win. If it's "Mission Accomplished", then it's already been won. But if it's bringing some kind of normalcy to the region with sustainable economy (so that poppy is not the national crop) and a stable govt. with enough support to defend itself... I don't think that's going to happen there. Period.
But then, man-o-war has different views.
|
|
Posts:
1,147
Registered:
2/11/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 3:11 PM
in response to: CodeCorrector
|
|
|
> > I say, US out of Afghanistan.
> > Let the jihadis roll over India and do what they
> > please.
>
> Pop quiz....
> Where was Bin Laden & Co sitting and planning the
> 9/11?
>
> Sure, roll out of Afghanistan, and let the jihadis do
> what they please!!
Oh that's funny. Thanks for reminding me that Bin Laden spent
a little time in Afghanistan. Bin Laden has plenty of vacation spots, right?
As if we are too stupid to know that Bin Laden's safest and most current haven is and has been, in fact, in Pakistan- which up until 1948 was part of - pop quiz - which country? Your turn now.
Whenever we look at the jihad mess we are in, all roads lead to three places - Iran, Saudi Arabia and India/Pakistan.
You are such a dufus. And you can't even wait two posts before contradicting yourself and saying "Yes, the US should quit Afghan" to Joan.
|
|
Posts:
15
Registered:
11/4/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 6:23 PM
in response to: manowar
|
|
|
In all honesty, west should give a green signal to Indians to take on Pakis. No one knows Pakis better than Indians. For all the IT problems we have with India, the change should come from within. We can not expect them to stop offering tech services or stealing the jobs from us. Who would turn away the dollars, if our fat cats offer them?
|
|
Posts:
2,549
Registered:
5/2/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 6:40 PM
in response to: GoRIA
|
|
|
You sound very much like you're an Indian yourself.. it's "green light"..
|
|
Posts:
15
Registered:
11/4/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 7:45 PM
in response to: NHJoan
|
|
|
What's your point???
|
|
Posts:
175
Registered:
5/25/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 9:23 PM
in response to: manowar
|
|
|
Lmao cough blackwater cough even the wars outsourced peeps contractors make way more than regular GI Joe's thats how messed up and corrupt our politicians are and asking Mr.Patel to take on anything more than his cash register at the corner shop is too ludicrous to think about now that Pak's nuclear I say f#^%^ the whole world let emm take care of their own problems we just make sure the borders are secure how many billions of dollars that would save give LEO's enough power to check out suspicious characters like the one in NY by Generalissimo Rudy (lol) stop and frisk INS status check etc then see how many ragheads and other various scumb@gs get to run loose over here
|
|
Posts:
2,549
Registered:
5/2/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 4, 2009 10:58 PM
in response to: GoRIA
|
|
|
You know the 'point'. And Mr Nafta Gates you havea point too. We can nuke the planet if we have to, and maybe a more standoff aproach is the way to go. Point taken, port security, airport security - Fortress America. The Globalists are ruining us
|
|
Posts:
2,702
Registered:
3/2/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 5, 2009 1:00 PM
in response to: manowar
|
|
|
> Oh that's funny. Thanks for reminding me that Bin
> Laden spent
> a little time in Afghanistan. Bin Laden has plenty
> of vacation spots, right?
Hmmm. Good point.
If Afghanistan was a "vacation spot" for Bin Laden, and he spent "little time" there in Afghanistan, care to explain why Mr W went gun toting to that sad place? Are you saying that US intelligence and Govt. was stupid to not know that Afghanistan was Bin Laden's "vacation spot"?
|
|
Posts:
1,147
Registered:
2/11/09
|
|
|
|
Re: Why not H1-B suicide bombers?
Posted:
Nov 5, 2009 7:41 PM
in response to: CodeCorrector
|
|
|
> > Oh that's funny. Thanks for reminding me that Bin
> > Laden spent
> > a little time in Afghanistan. Bin Laden has
> plenty
> > of vacation spots, right?
>
> Hmmm. Good point.
>
> If Afghanistan was a "vacation spot" for Bin Laden,
> and he spent "little time" there in Afghanistan, care
> to explain why Mr W went gun toting to that sad
> place? Are you saying that US intelligence and Govt.
> was stupid to not know that Afghanistan was Bin
> Laden's "vacation spot"?
I said "a little time", not "little time" - is your English so poor that you don't
know the distinction?
Do I still need to answer this not-so-bright question about
why Bush sent the troops to Afghanistan? Right, it was because Bin Laden spent
a little time there. It was in the newspapers.
If you are just having problems with English, my apologies- I do not wish to be unkind.
But otherwise this is a real dumb question.
Do you have some kind of a point here, at all?
|
|
|
Legend
|
|
Helpful Answer
|
|
Correct Answer
|
|
